Prediction of Nick Lindahl vs Adam Feeney Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Lindahl vs A. Feeney

Nick Lindahl
AUS
l
w
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
l
4
Win
5
Played
1
Win
37
Age
40
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
5'10" (178 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
186
Best Rank
248
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$25.7K
Career Money
$15.3K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Adam Feeney
AUS
w
w
w
l
w
w
w
l
l
l
4
Win
5
Played
1
Win
37
Age
40
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
5'10" (178 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
186
Best Rank
248
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$25.7K
Career Money
$15.3K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Lindahl 4 - 1 Feeney
They have played 11 sets in total, with Nick Lindahl winning 8 and Adam Feeney winning 3. The last match between Nick Lindahl and Adam Feeney was at the Australia F9, 11-10-2010, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Nick Lindahl getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lindahl | 4 |
| Feeney | 1 |
Last 5 H2H Matches:
(QF) Australia F9(10-11-10)
Nick Lindahl
6
6
Adam Feeney
4
4
(R1) Busan Open Challenger Tennis - Busan(04-14-08)
Nick Lindahl
6
7
Adam Feeney
4
6
(QF) USA F18(07-17-06)
Nick Lindahl
6
7
Adam Feeney
4
5
N. Lindahl vs A. Feeney H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $25,660 | Career Prize Money | $15,265 |
| 58.76% (265-186) | Career Total W/L | 55.62% (292-233) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 4 | Hard | 0 |
| 8 | Titles | 6 |
| 4 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. Lindahl vs A. Feeney Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nick Lindahl has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Adam Feeney has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nick Lindahl, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Adam Feeney has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nick Lindahl has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Adam Feeney has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nick Lindahl has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Adam Feeney winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nick Lindahl has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 236/157), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/4). Adam Feeney has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 229/167), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 7/10).
- Player level: In the last year, Nick Lindahl has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Adam Feeney has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 5 times before with Nick Lindahl winning 4 times and Adam Feeney being victorious 1 times. They have played 11 sets in total, with Nick Lindahl winning 8 and Adam Feeney winning 3.
- The last match between Nick Lindahl and Adam Feeney was at the Australia F9, 11-10-2010, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Nick Lindahl getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nick Lindahl has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Adam Feeney has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nick Lindahl has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Adam Feeney has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nick Lindahl has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Adam Feeney has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Nick Lindahl vs Adam Feeney Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Lindahl vs A. Feeney H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 8 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 61 | Games Won | 51 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 80% (4/5) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (4/4) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/4) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Lindahl 0%, Feeney 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Lindahl 0%, Feeney 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Lindahl 0%, Feeney 0%.
N. Lindahl Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 5-0 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
A. Feeney Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 1-6 6-2 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
QF | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(3) 6-3 | ||

N. Lindahl vs A. Feeney Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.76% (265/186) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.62% (292/233) |
| 58.88% (590/412) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.56% (670/536) |
| 52.90% (4943/4401) | Games Win/Loss | 52.71% (6008/5391) |
| 60.05% (236/157) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.83% (229/167) |
| 55.00% (22/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 46.30% (25/29) |
| 46.15% (6/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 41.38% (12/17) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 56.52% (26/20) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 269 | Aces Total | 161 |
| 0.04 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.05 |
| 173 | Total Double Faults | 256 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 516.81 | Average Opponent Rank | 486.59 |
| 63% (2510/3991) | 1st Serve % | 64% (2097/3279) |
| 68% (1705/2510) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (1413/2097) |
| 49% (720/1481) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (510/1182) |
| 39% (133/340) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (111/262) |
| 37% (1437/3897) | Return Points Win % | 37% (1140/3043) |
| 0.00% (0/11) | Slam W/L | 20.00% (2/8) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.78% (19/17) | Main Tour W/L | 40.00% (8/12) |
| 50.96% (80/77) | Challenger W/L | 46.75% (72/82) |
| 67.35% (165/80) | Futures W/L | 61.58% (210/131) |
| 62% (262/424) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (284/512) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 60% (3/5) |
| 66% (76/116) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (79/164) |
| 50% (60/121) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (70/159) |
| 88% (258/228) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (309/259) |
| 11% (258/29) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (309/49) |
| 19% (192/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (216/33) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
12:00 PM 16/11/25
Prediction03:30 PM 16/11/25
Prediction05:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction05:30 AM 16/11/25
Prediction03:30 AM 16/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
15 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Simona Waltert Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Auger-Aliassime Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
H2H 5-10
H2H 0-0
23:05
H2H 1-0
00:55
H2H 0-1
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Luanda
Angola
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal